since the point was to review the movie BASED on the trailer that does not change how the trailer presents a film. MANY trailers vastly misrepresent the film so I would not change what I said about the trailers.

you do realize that every one of these were from Geek Juice’s Trailer Park… where the POINT is to review the trailer alone right and before the movie comes out?

So they are just skipping remaking Lawnmower Man (most likely to avoid paying Stephen King again) and simply remaking Lawnmower Man 2: Jobes War with Johnny Depp as Jobe? Got it.

Ooooo haunted objects… so Amityville direct to video sequel territory… was a haunted clock or a haunted lamp too lame for you? How about a… wait for it… HAUNTED MIRROR????

Okay if “Nymphomaniac Volume II” is now the definition substituting for pretentious… then “Afflicted” will be the new landmark for idiotic and uninspired.

I can admit when I am wrong… it turns out I jumped the gun when I called Nymphomaniac Vol I the very definition of Pretentious

Also of note is that they only use the good quotes and the honest quotes such as these get kicked away (all real quotes from real critics) “Although Under the Skin screams allegory, it’s hard to see for what.”, “It didn’t get under my skin, just on my nerves.” (Irish Independent) or this great one “Viewers willing to embrace a purely visual experience without dramatic, emotional or psychological substance will comprise an ardent cheering section, but the film provides too little for even relatively adventurous specialized audiences to latch on to, spelling a very limited commercial life.” (Hollywood Reporter)

A movie that thinks it’s clever and yet is merely pseudo-clever only reinforces the idiocy therein.

This looks to be another CGIgasm with an over-convoluted story that is meant to reach deep but in fact only goes to show it’s utter lack of either creativity or restraint.

I will reserve judgement on this one until I see the first movie.